1. Introduction
Urban residential colonies depend on a continuous, safe, and
adequate supply of potable water to fulfil domestic, commercial, firefighting,
and public utility requirements. In government-approved housing developments,
the planning, design, and implementation of water supply systems must conform
to the provisions of national building codes, public health engineering
standards, and regulations issued by local governing bodies and development
authorities. Compliance with these guidelines ensures public safety, system
reliability, and
long-term sustainability. A scientifically designed water
supply system involves several integrated components, including the
identification and assessment of suitable water sources, transmission through
conveyance systems, provision of adequate storage facilities, efficient
distribution networks, and the incorporation of pumping arrangements where
gravity flow is insufficient. Additionally, continuous monitoring and control
of water quality are crucial to ensure that the supplied water meets the
prescribed drinking water standards [1].
Components of a Water Supply Scheme
·
Water
source (Groundwater / Municipal bulk supply/surface reservoir)
·
Intake
well and Rising main
·
Treatment
and disinfection (where applicable)
·
Overhead/underground
storage reservoir (OHSR/UGR)
·
Distribution
network (pipes, valves, hydrants)
·
Pumping
system and control units
·
Household
service connections and meters
2. Population
Forecasting
Population forecasting constitutes a
critical foundation for the planning, design, and long-term sustainability of
urban infrastructure systems, particularly municipal water supply networks.
Reliable estimation of future population growth is essential to ensure that
infrastructure capacity aligns with projected demand over the designated design
horizon, thereby preventing both system inadequacy and inefficient overdesign.
In the context of urban residential colonies, population projections are
typically developed for a design period of 20–30 years and are derived from an
integrated analysis of historical census data, prevailing demographic trends,
migration patterns, land-use policies, housing density regulations, and
socio-economic development indicators. These projections directly inform the
estimation of domestic and non-domestic water demand, storage requirements,
pumping capacities, and the dimensions of the distribution network. A
range of established forecasting methodologies is employed depending on the
stage of urban development and the reliability of available data. Conventional
techniques, such as the arithmetic increase method, assume a uniform absolute
growth rate and are generally applicable to mature or stabilised urban areas.
The geometric increase method, which accounts for compound growth, is more appropriate
for rapidly expanding urban settlements. The incremental increase method
refines these approaches by incorporating variations in growth rates observed
across successive decades. For planned residential developments and large urban
agglomerations, advanced analytical models such as logistic growth curves and
master plan based projections are often adopted to reflect growth saturation
limits, regulatory constraints, and planned spatial expansion.
The selection of an appropriate forecasting approach
is of paramount importance, as inaccuracies in population estimates can have
significant technical and economic implications. Underestimation may lead to
premature system failure, service deficits, and public health risks, while
overestimation can result in unnecessary capital expenditure and suboptimal
system performance. Consequently, population forecasting should be undertaken
through a critical evaluation of multiple projection scenarios and validated
against regional development strategies and policy frameworks.
Within water supply system design, population
forecasts form the basis for determining per capita demand, peak demand
factors, and fire-fighting water requirements. Thus, robust and defensible
population projections are essential for the development of efficient,
resilient, and sustainable urban water supply systems that can accommodate
future growth and evolving demand patterns. The various methods of population
forecasting are discussed below:
2.1 Arithmetic Increase Method
For population projection, the arithmetic increase method is a straightforward and popular approach that works best in towns or urban
regions with consistent and steady growth or slowly developing metropolitan
regions because of its simplicity and ease of use.
(1)
where,
= Population after n
decades,
= Population at last known census,
= Arithmetic mean of population increases in
the known decades, n = no. of decades.
2.2
Geometric
Increase Method
A popular demographic strategy for predicting population growth, where the rate of increase is
thought to be proportionate to the current population, is the geometric increase method.
This approach
is easily suitable for metropolitan areas that are growing
steadily and quickly as result of economic development, migration, and industrialisation.
The geometric
approach takes into account a consistent percentage growth over time, in contrast to
the
arithmetic increase method, which assumes a constant absolute rise.
This approach projects the future population
by first calculating the average percentage increase
using the historical census data.
The anticipated population
is calculated using
the following expression after n decades:
(2)
where,
= Population at
last known census, r = Assumed growth rate %,
Assumed growth
rate % (r) is computed with
a. Arithmetic Average Method =
(3)
b.Geometric Increase Method
(4)
2.3
Incremental
Increase Method
The
incremental increase method is a modified form of the arithmetic increase
approach and is employed for population forecasting when historical data
indicate a systematic variation in the rate of population growth. Unlike
methods that assume uniform growth, this technique incorporates both the
average decadal population increase and the average incremental change in that
increase, thereby accounting for accelerating or decelerating growth trends
over time. Consequently, it is particularly applicable to urban regions
undergoing phased development, industrial expansion, or socio-economic
transformation.
The method involves determining the mean decadal population increase
from past census records, followed by estimating the average incremental
increase, defined as the mean difference between successive decadal increases.
The projected population
after
decades from the base year is computed using
the following expression:
(5)
where,
= Population after n
decades,
= Population at last known census, n = no. of
decades,
= Average Increase,
= Average Incremental Increase.
3. Design
Period
The design period is defined as the time span for which the
components of a water supply system are planned to perform satisfactorily
without requiring major augmentation. For a government-approved residential
colony, the design period is selected based on statutory guidelines, expected
population growth, functional life of infrastructure, and economic
considerations.
As per the CPHEEO Manual on Water Supply and
Treatment, the
recommended design periods for various components of an urban water supply system
are summarized in Table 1.
For the
present study, a design period of 30
years has been adopted for population forecasting, source development,
transmission mains, and distribution network, in accordance with CPHEEO
recommendations. Mechanical components such as pumps and electromechanical
equipment have been designed for a 15-year
period, considering technological obsolescence and maintenance
requirements. The treatment units have been planned with phased capacity
augmentation to accommodate incremental demand over the design horizon.
|
Component
|
Recommended Design Period
|
|
Population projection
|
30 years
|
|
Source of water
|
30 years
|
|
Intake structures
|
30 years
|
|
Transmission mains
|
30 years
|
|
Water treatment plant
|
15–30 years
|
|
Clear water reservoirs
|
15 years
|
|
Pumping machinery
|
15 years
|
|
Distribution system
|
30 years
|
Table 1 Components Design
Period
Adopting
a 30-year design period ensures long-term sustainability, optimal capital
investment, and compliance with government norms for planned residential
colonies.
Fig. 1 Flow chart of supply overview for 15-30 years.
4.
Estimation of Water
Demand
Accurate estimation of water demand
constitutes a fundamental component in the planning and design of urban water
supply systems, as it directly influences the capacity of source development,
treatment facilities, storage infrastructure, and distribution networks. For a
government-approved residential colony, water demand assessment must conform to
nationally accepted guidelines to ensure technical adequacy, operational
reliability, and long-term sustainability[2].
In the present study, domestic water
demand has been estimated in accordance with the CPHEEO Manual on Water Supply and
Treatment, which recommends a per capita water supply of 135 litres per capita per day (lpcd) for urban
residential areas equipped with piped water supply and sewerage systems. The
average daily water demand has been computed as the product of the design
population and the prescribed per capita demand.
In addition to domestic consumption,
provisions have been incorporated for institutional, commercial, and public utility requirements, along with system losses, commonly referred to as
unaccounted-for water (UFW). In line with CPHEEO recommendations, an allowance
of 15–20% of the total
demand has been
considered to account for conveyance losses, leakage, unauthorized usage, and
operational inefficiencies.
To capture temporal variations in
consumption, appropriate demand factors have been applied. The maximum daily demand has been assumed as 1.8 times the average daily demand, while the peak hourly demand has been taken as 2.7 times the average daily demand. These
demand multipliers are essential for the hydraulic design of pumping units,
service reservoirs, and distribution pipelines to ensure satisfactory
performance under peak load conditions.[3]
Accordingly, the design water demand
has been determined by integrating average, maximum, and peak demand scenarios,
thereby ensuring compliance with statutory norms and providing a resilient and
efficient water supply system over the adopted design period.
4.1 Per Capita Demand
It is the
annual average amount of daily water required by one person and includes the
domestic, industrial and commercial use, public use, wastes, thefts etc.
(6)
4.2 Peak Demand Factor
The peak
demand factor represents the ratio of the maximum short-term water consumption
to the average daily demand and is used to account for temporal variations in
water use within a distribution system. In accordance with the CPHEEO
Manual on Water Supply and Treatment, the maximum daily demand is generally taken as 1.8 times the average daily demand, while the peak hourly demand is assumed to be 2.7 times the average daily demand.
Accordingly, the peak demand factor (
) may be expressed as:
(7)
4.3 Fire
Demand
Fire demand constitutes an essential component of
total water requirement in urban water supply planning, particularly for
government-approved residential colonies, where public safety and emergency
preparedness are mandatory considerations. Fire demand represents the quantity
of water required to control and extinguish fires and is generally
characterized by short-duration, high-intensity withdrawal from the
distribution system.
As recommended by the CPHEEO Manual on Water Supply and Treatment, fire demand is not
directly added to the average daily water demand; instead, it is considered
separately while designing the distribution network, storage reservoirs, and
pumping capacity. The assessment of fire demand depends on population size,
building density, land use pattern, and fire risk classification of the area.
For urban residential areas, fire demand is commonly
estimated using empirical relationships such as Kuichling’s formula, which is expressed as:
(8)
where
= fire demand (litres per minute),
= population of the area (in thousands)
5.
Storage Reservoir
Capacity
Storage reservoirs play a critical role in urban
water supply systems by balancing the temporal mismatch between continuous or
intermittent water production and the fluctuating consumer demand. The capacity
of storage reservoirs directly influences the reliability, operational
flexibility, and pressure stability of the distribution network, particularly
in government-approved residential colonies.
In accordance with the CPHEEO Manual on Water
Supply and Treatment, the storage capacity is primarily designed to satisfy
balancing storage requirements, fire demand, and emergency storage, depending
on the system configuration and level of service. For systems with continuous
pumping and supply, the balancing storage is typically considered to be
one-third of the average daily demand. In cases where pumping is carried out
for limited hours, additional storage is provided to compensate for non-pumping
periods.
Fire
storage is provided separately and is based on the estimated fire demand and
the required duration of fire-fighting operations, typically ranging from 2 to
4 hours, depending on local fire safety regulations. Emergency storage is
included to account for unforeseen events such as power failure, source
interruption, or maintenance shutdowns and is commonly considered as 10–15% of
the average daily demand. Thus, the total capacity of the storage reservoir (
) may be expressed as:
(9)
Where,
= balancing storage,
= fire storage,
= emergency storage
For the present study, the reservoir capacity has
been determined by incorporating balancing, fire, and emergency storage
components in compliance with CPHEEO recommendations. This approach ensures
adequate system resilience, uninterrupted water supply during peak demand and
emergency conditions, and conformity with statutory planning norms.
5.1. Balancing Storage
Balancing storage is provided in a water supply system
to equalize the difference between the uniform rate of water production
(treatment and pumping) and the non-uniform pattern of consumer demand over a
24-hour period. It ensures continuous and adequate supply during peak demand
hours while maintaining operational efficiency.
As per the CPHEEO Manual on Water Supply and
Treatment, for urban water supply systems operating with continuous pumping,
the required balancing storage capacity is generally taken as a fraction of the
average daily demand. The balancing storage (
) may be expressed as:
(10)
Where,
= balancing storage
capacity (m³),
= average daily water
demand (m³/day)
5.2. Balancing Storage
Fire storage refers to the portion of reservoir
capacity reserved exclusively to meet water requirements during fire-fighting
operations. Unlike balancing storage, fire storage is not associated with
routine consumption but is provided to ensure adequate discharge and pressure
for effective fire control, particularly in government-approved residential
colonies where fire safety is a statutory requirement.[4]
In accordance with the CPHEEO Manual on Water Supply
and Treatment, fire storage is determined based on the estimated fire demand
and the duration for which the required flow must be sustained. The fire
storage capacity (
) is calculated using the
following relationship:
(11)
Where,
= fire storage capacity
(m³),
= fire demand (m³/hour),
= duration of
fire-fighting operation (hours).
5.3. Emergency Storage
Emergency storage constitutes an essential component
of reservoir capacity in urban water supply systems, providing continuity of
supply during unforeseen disruptions such as power failures, mechanical
breakdowns of pumping units, source contamination, pipeline damage, or
scheduled maintenance activities. Unlike balancing and fire storage, emergency
storage addresses system reliability and resilience in the event of abnormal
operating conditions.
According to the CPHEEO Manual on Water Supply and
Treatment, emergency storage is typically expressed as a fraction of the
average daily water demand, ranging from 10–15% of the average daily demand,
depending on the level of service, reliability of power supply, and operational
characteristics of the system.
The emergency storage capacity (
) may be expressed as:
(12)
Where,
= emergency storage
capacity (m³),
= average daily water
demand (m³/day)
Fig.1 Storage
Reservoir Capacity
6.
Pipe Diameter and Distribution Design
The design of pipe diameters and the layout of the
distribution network are critical aspects of urban water supply systems, as
they directly influence hydraulic performance, service pressure, water quality,
and overall system reliability. For a government-approved residential colony,
the distribution system must be designed to deliver the required quantity of
water at adequate pressure under peak demand and fire-flow conditions, in
compliance with statutory standards.
In the present study, pipe diameters have been
determined based on the peak hourly
demand, incorporating the adopted peak demand factor, to ensure
satisfactory performance during periods of maximum consumption. Hydraulic
design has been carried out using the continuity and energy equations, with
head losses estimated using the Hazen–Williams
formula, as recommended by CPHEEO for water distribution systems:
(13)
Where,
= head loss due to
friction (m),
= length of pipe (m),
= discharge (m³/s),
= internal diameter of
pipe (m),
= Hazen–Williams roughness
coefficient
The value of the roughness coefficient (
) has been selected based
on the pipe material, typically ranging from 110 to 140 for commonly used materials such as ductile iron and
PVC.
The distribution network has been designed as a looped (grid) system, which offers
superior hydraulic performance, improved pressure balance, and enhanced
reliability compared to dead-end systems. Minimum residual pressure of 7–12 m at consumer taps has been
ensured under peak demand conditions, in accordance with CPHEEO
recommendations. Additionally, pipe velocities have been maintained within the
desirable range of 0.6 to 2.0 m/s
to prevent sediment deposition and excessive head losses.
Fire-flow requirements have been superimposed on the
peak demand scenario to verify the adequacy of pipe diameters and network
configuration under emergency conditions. The final pipe sizes have been
selected by satisfying hydraulic constraints related to discharge capacity,
allowable head loss, velocity limits, and minimum pressure criteria.
Thus, the adopted pipe diameter selection and
distribution network design ensure efficient, reliable, and standards-compliant
water supply throughout the service area over the design period.
Case Study:
Present
population,
= 4,000 persons
Design
period,
= 20 years
Annual
growth rate,
= 2% = 0.02
Per capita
water demand,
= 135 lpcp
Peak demand
factor,
= 2.0
Design Population
Estimation
(Using Geometric Increase
Method, commonly adopted for urban planning)
2. Average Daily Water
Demand
3. Peak Water Demand
4. Peak Discharge (for Distribution Design)
Maximum Daily Demand
Required
Storage (30% of daily demand)
Example Pipe Flow Calculation
Assume demand through main = 20 L/s, velocity = 1.0 m/s
Design Considerations and Standards for Water Supply Scheme in a
Government Residential Colony
The water supply scheme for a
government residential colony shall be planned and designed to provide a
continuous, safe, and adequate supply of potable water in accordance with
CPHEEO Manual on Water Supply and Treatment, relevant BIS standards, and
applicable state Public Health Engineering Department (PHED) guidelines. The
system shall be designed to meet present and future demands over the approved
design period with due consideration to operational efficiency, public health
safety, and sustainability.
Design Period
The design period shall be
selected based on projected population growth, service life of components, and
scope for future expansion. As per CPHEEO guidelines:
Distribution system: 30 years
Service reservoirs (OHT/UGR):
30 years
Pumping machinery and
electromechanical equipment: 15 years
Population Forecasting
The future population of the
government colony shall be estimated using standard forecasting techniques such
as the geometric increase method or incremental increase method, depending on
historical growth trends and approved housing plans. The projected population
at the end of the design period shall form the basis for demand estimation.
Water Demand Norms
Per capita water demand shall
be adopted as per CPHEEO norms:
Residential demand (with
sewerage): 135 lpcd
Floating population and public
uses: 5–10% of domestic demand
Unaccounted-for water (UFW):
10–15%
Fire demand shall be assessed
separately in accordance with IS 9668 or local fire authority requirements.
Demand Variations and Peak Factors
To account for temporal
variations in water use:
Maximum daily demand = 1.8 ×
average daily demand
Peak hourly demand = 2.0 – 3.0
× average hourly demand
The system shall be hydraulically adequate to meet peak-hour demand conditions.
Source of Water Supply
The source shall be selected
based on adequacy, reliability, quality, and sustainability. Surface water,
groundwater, or a conjunctive source may be adopted. The raw water quality
shall conform to IS 10500: Drinking Water Specifications after treatment.
Treatment and Disinfection
Water treatment facilities, if
required, shall be designed based on source water quality. Minimum treatment
shall include filtration and disinfection. Chlorination shall be provided to
maintain a residual chlorine level of 0.2–0.5 mg/L at consumer ends.
Distribution System Design
·
The distribution network shall be designed to ensure:
·
Minimum residual pressure of 7 m at the farthest
consumer point during peak demand
·
Minimum velocity of 0.6 m/s for self-cleansing
·
Maximum velocity not exceeding 2.5 m/s
Hydraulic design may be carried out using the Hazen–Williams equation, ensuring
economical pipe diameters.
Pipe Materials and Standards
·
Pipe materials shall be selected based on durability,
soil conditions, pressure requirements, and lifecycle cost. Commonly adopted
materials include:
·
Ductile Iron (DI) pipes conforming to IS 8329
·
HDPE pipes conforming to IS 4984
All fittings, valves, and appurtenances shall conform to relevant BIS
standards.
Storage and Pumping Facilities
·
Underground reservoirs and overhead service reservoirs
shall be designed to meet:
·
Balancing storage
·
Fire demand
·
Emergency storage Pumping systems shall be designed
for peak demand with 100% standby capacity to ensure an uninterrupted water
supply.
Firefighting Provision
Fire demand shall be
incorporated as per IS 9668 and local fire department norms. Fire hydrants
shall be strategically located within the colony to ensure accessibility and
safety.
Operation, Maintenance, and Reliability
The system shall be designed
for ease of operation and maintenance. Isolation valves, bulk meters, and
pressure-reducing valves shall be provided to ensure effective system control
and minimise water losses.
Sustainability Considerations
Water conservation measures
such as rainwater harvesting, leakage control, and energy-efficient pumping
shall be integrated into the design. The scheme shall support long-term
sustainability and resource optimisation.[5]
This study presents a comprehensive and
standards-based methodology for planning and designing water supply systems for
government-approved residential colonies. By integrating population
forecasting, water demand assessment, storage reservoir sizing, pumping
requirements, and hydraulic design of the distribution network, the proposed
approach ensures technical adequacy, operational reliability, and regulatory
compliance over the designated design period. Adoption of CPHEEO guidelines,
relevant BIS standards, and statutory norms provides a robust framework for delivering
safe and adequate potable water while accommodating future population growth.[6]
The case study demonstrates the practical
applicability of the methodology and highlights the importance of accurate
population projections and demand estimations in achieving an efficient and
cost-effective system design. Proper consideration of peak demand variations,
fire-fighting requirements, and emergency storage enhances system resilience
and public safety. Furthermore, the use of looped distribution networks, appropriate
pipe sizing, and controlled velocities ensures satisfactory hydraulic
performance and long-term serviceability.
Overall, the findings affirm that a systematic, scientifically grounded,
and regulation-compliant design approach is essential for sustainable urban
water supply planning. The methodology outlined in this paper can serve as a
reference framework for engineers, planners, and policymakers involved in
developing residential water supply infrastructure, and it can be effectively
adapted to similar urban settings with varying scales and growth
characteristics.[7]
6. Conclusion
The case study clearly demonstrates that effective safety
practices are essential for multi‑storied building construction projects.
Proper planning, training, PPE usage, and continuous monitoring can
significantly reduce accidents. Numerical safety indicators such as AFR and ASR
are useful tools for evaluating safety performance. Ensuring a safe working
environment not only protects workers but also enhances project efficiency and
quality.