1. Introduction
Contamination of water by heavy
metals is a critical environmental and health concern worldwide [1]. Metals
with atomic density greater than 4g/cm3 belong to heavy
metals. Cu, Cd, Zn, Pb, Hg, As, Ag, Cr, Fe, and Platinum group elements are
heavy metals [2]. Iron in its divalent form, Fe(II), a secondary pollutant
generally found in water sources, can pose serious health hazards and
environmental concerns when present in excess concentration. According to World
Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, 0.3 mg/L of iron in drinking
water is safe for consumption [3]. Therefore, the effective removal of
Fe(II) ions from aqueous systems is of great importance [4].
Several conventional techniques,
such as ion exchange, membrane filtration [5], chemical precipitation [6], and
coagulation-flocculation [7], have been used for heavy metal removal. However,
many of these methods are expensive, generate secondary pollutants, or require
sophisticated infrastructure. In contrast, adsorption has emerged as a simple,
cost-effective, and eco-friendly alternative. The use of natural bio-adsorbents,
in particular, offers additional benefits such as renewability,
biodegradability, and low operational cost [8-10].
In the present study, we
investigated the adsorption of Fe(II) ions at different initial metal ion
concentrations using two natural bio-adsorbents: Marua plant and Albizia
lebbeck. A comparative analysis was carried out to evaluate their adsorption
efficiency under specific experimental conditions of pH and temperature [11-13].
The results indicate that adsorption capacity increases with rising initial
Fe(II) concentration until equilibrium is reached [14]. It was also finds that
adsorption increases with increase in contact time [15]. Furthermore, the
adsorption potential was found to be higher in leaf-based adsorbents compared
to seed-based ones. Among the two tested bio-adsorbents, Albizia lebbeck
demonstrated superior adsorption efficiency compared to the Marua plant under
the studied conditions.
2.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
Chemicals and reagents
All chemicals used in this study
were of Analytical Reagent (A.R.) or Laboratory Reagent (L.R.) grade and were
used without further purification. Ferrous ion solutions of desired
concentrations were prepared using FeSO₄·7H₂O with double-distilled water. The
1,10-phenanthroline reagent was used for colorimetric determination of Fe(II)
ions.
Preparation of Bio-adsorbents
Leaves and seeds of Marua plant and Albizia lebbeck were collected, washed
thoroughly with distilled water to remove surface impurities, and dried at room
temperature. The dried materials were then ground into fine powder and sieved
to obtain a uniform particle size. The prepared powders were stored in airtight
containers and used as bio-adsorbents.
Batch Adsorption Experiments
Batch adsorption experiments were
carried out by adding 500 mg of
bio-adsorbent to 50 mL of Fe(II)
solution of known concentration in separate glass bottles. The bottles
were agitated in a mechanical shaker at predetermined time intervals of 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 minutes.
After shaking, the suspensions were centrifuged and filtered to separate the
adsorbent from the aqueous phase.
Analytical Determination
The residual Fe(II) ion
concentration in the filtrate was determined spectrophotometrically using the 1, 10-phenanthroline method.
Absorbance was measured at the characteristic wavelength for Fe(II)-phenanthroline
complex.
Experimental Parameters
The effect of different operational
parameters on Fe(II) adsorption was studied, including:
- Initial Fe(II) ion
concentration:
100, 150, 200, and 250 mg/50 mL
- Solution
pH:
maintained at 8.0
- Temperature: maintained at 303 KTop of Form
3. RESULT AND
DISCUSSION
MARUA PLANT
Table 1 Impact of Commencing Metal Ion Strength (Leaf of Marua
Plant)
|
Time
(Sec)
|
Metal
Ion Concentration
|
|
100
mg/L
|
150
mg/L
|
200
mg/L
|
250
mg/L
|
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
20
|
0.98
|
1.95
|
2.53
|
3.09
|
|
40
|
1.07
|
2.12
|
2.59
|
3.18
|
|
60
|
1.23
|
2.34
|
2.89
|
3.29
|
|
80
|
1.35
|
2.43
|
2.97
|
3.49
|
|
100
|
1.39
|
2.49
|
3.09
|
3.56
|
|
120
|
1.64
|
2.77
|
3.15
|
3.78
|
|
140
|
1.64
|
2.77
|
3.15
|
3.78
|
|
160
|
1.64
|
2.77
|
3.15
|
3.78
|
Fig. 1: Effect of Initial
Metal Ion Density
Table 2: Effect of Metal Ion Amount per volume (seed of Marua
Plant)
|
Time
(Sec.)
|
Metal Ion Concentration
|
|
|
100mg/L
|
150
mg/L
|
200
mg/L
|
250 mg/L
|
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
20
|
0.45
|
0.54
|
0.79
|
0.91
|
|
40
|
0.47
|
0.62
|
0.82
|
0.95
|
|
60
|
0.49
|
0.68
|
0.85
|
0.98
|
|
80
|
0.52
|
0.73
|
0.89
|
1.03
|
|
100
|
0.56
|
0.75
|
0.91
|
1.07
|
|
120
|
0.57
|
0.82
|
0.95
|
1.12
|
|
140
|
0.57
|
0.82
|
0.95
|
1.12
|
|
160
|
0.57
|
0.82
|
0.95
|
1.12
|
Fig: 2 Effect of
Initial Metal Ion Concentration
Albizia lebbeck
Table 3: Effect of Initial Metal Ion Potency (Leaf of Albizia
lebbeck)
|
Time
(Sec)
|
Metal Ion Concentration
|
|
|
100mg/L
|
150
mg/L
|
200
mg/L
|
250
mg/L
|
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
20
|
0.99
|
1.99
|
2.61
|
3.15
|
|
40
|
1.09
|
2.15
|
2.61
|
3.21
|
|
60
|
1.26
|
2.38
|
2.92
|
3.31
|
|
80
|
1.38
|
2.46
|
2.99
|
3.48
|
|
100
|
1.41
|
2.51
|
3.13
|
3.59
|
|
120
|
1.68
|
2.80
|
3.18
|
3.82
|
|
140
|
1.68
|
2.80
|
3.18
|
3.82
|
|
160
|
1.68
|
2.80
|
3.18
|
3.82
|
Fig.3: Effect of Initial Concentration of Metal Ion
Effect of Initial Metal Concentration
|
Table 4 Effect of Initial Metal Ion Mass (Seed of Albizia lebbeck)
Fig.4: Effect of Metal Ion Concentration
Fig.5: Comparative
Study of Adsorption
Fig: 6 Comparative study of Adsorption
CONCLUSION
Figs
represent % removal of Fe (II) versus
the starting metal ion concentration. The study of the graph shows that, with
an increase in metal ion concentration, the % removal of Fe (II) ion decreases. The reason for this is that a limited number
of active sites are present in the active site of the adsorbent, and after
saturation, there is no adsorption at the active site. Leaf shows much better
adsorption capacity than the seed. Albizia lebbeck shows better adsorption
capacity than the Marua plant in particular condition (pH and Temperature).